Commit 46f08a
2026-08-26 12:03:56 novaflash: -/-| /dev/null .. Meetings/2026/2026-08-26.md | |
| @@ 0,0 1,47 @@ | |
| + | # Basic info |
| + | |
| + | * Time: Wednesday 26 August 2026 at 14:00 CEST (12:00 UTC) |
| + | * Place: #openvpn-meeting channel on !LiberaChat IRC network |
| + | |
| + | # Topics |
| + | |
| + | * **Updated: 2.7.7 release** |
| + | Currently we are aiming for another release at around September 2. |
| + | There are some small security issues, mostly Windows related and involving rather unlikely scenarios. |
| + | |
| + | - **community meetup 2026** |
| + | Coordination is currently taking place here: https://community.openvpn.net/Meetups/2026-Paderborn |
| + | The date is around 17 and 18 October, location in Paderborn, Germany. |
| + | For the t-shirt we have some idea of what to do. Will check with designer if he can do it for us. |
| + | |
| + | * **Updated: Amount of open changes in the queue** |
| + | OpenVPN Inc. and cron2 reached a deal where he gets paid part-time to work on OpenVPN2 code reviews/merges. |
| + | We encouraged razvanc and chugly from the company to get involved in the community as well to speed up reviews. |
| + | lev also promised he would spend some more time on reviewing, after his vacation. |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | # Backlog |
| + | |
| + | - **test latency and MTU in openvpn** |
| + | A new feature is proposed for adding to master; ability to do latency and MTU tests in the OpenVPN protocol. |
| + | Idea is to allow to do a 'best server selection' type of logic, in case there are multiple servers available to connect to. |
| + | RFC PR is at https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn-rfc/pull/30 and an early initial implementation is available from lev. |
| + | What's needed is a community member's review and ralf_lici did so and provided some comments. |
| + | |
| + | * **publish also on codeberg** |
| + | Suggestion was made by cron2 to also publish openvpn2 on codeberg. OpenVPN3 Linux is already there at this time. |
| + | It would not replace github but just serve as another place to publish the code. |
| + | No clear decision made as yet. Concerns raised about new avenues of opening tickets/PRs. |
| + | |
| + | - **2.7 security audit** |
| + | The security audit was completed for 2.7.0 and results are available internally. |
| + | We are working to publish this in an official blog post. ordex and novaflash are driving this in OpenVPN Inc. internally. |
| + | |
| + | * **Coordinating big changes** |
| + | A related discussion is how to handle big changesets (e.g. currently the multipeer changes from plaisthos and the |
| + | oob changes from lev). There was some unhappiness that these changesets are dropped without sufficient context and |
| + | that makes it hard to keep track of all the developments. One advise is that developers that want to have big (or many) |
| + | changes merged are encouraged to write a mail to the mailing list to provide a "cover letter" for the patch set and |
| + | a convenient place to discuss the overall direction without getting bogged down in the discussion of individual changes. |
| + | We have lost this practice since not generally using mail-based patchsets anymore. That can be also a good opportunity |
| + | to point out dicussions happening in PRs for the RFC document. |