Development Process
Background
- The first phase of the development process (work done in "testing") is handled properly.
- The last phase of the development process, official releases, are handled by James, but the process/requirements for a release are not documented.
- Right now, "testing" is effectively a fork of James' "stable" SVN tree.
- There is no roadmap for the next 2.x release.
Which Tree to Base Releases On?
Option 1: Basing Releases on James' "Stable" Tree
- There's no process to move code from "testing" (git) to "stable" (svn).
- The release process is not documented.
Option 2: Basing Releases on David's "Testing" Tree
- Currently, James makes his modifications to his SVN tree and David pulls his changes to "testing". In this regard, James' SVN tree is no different from any other external tree.
- Only David's "allmerged" branch contains all code (James', external trees, etc.).
- The "testing" tree should get the widest testing, especially after we start releasing testing snapshots and linking to them from openvpn.net.
How to Verify Stability of the "Testing" Code (for Moving to "Stable" or Prior to a Release?)
- Publishing or linking to "testing" releases on openvpn.net is essential to get wider use for "testing".
Other
Bridging Issues
- From OpenVPN FAQ on Bridging: "Another bridge disadvantage should be that layer2 is insecure by design, opening your layer2 exposes to ARP poisoning and the like."
