Home A - Z
Page Index

An Otter Wiki

Commit 19dbc6

2026-09-16 11:57:44 novaflash: -/-
Meetings/2026/2026-09-09.md ..
@@ 17,29 17,4 @@
- **Updated: test latency and MTU in openvpn**
A new feature is proposed for adding to master; ability to do latency and MTU tests in the OpenVPN protocol.
This would allow for a client to for example select the best available server based on test results.
- This is currently under review: https://gerrit.openvpn.net/q/topic:%22oob-server-probe%22
-
- # Backlog
-
- - **community meetup 2026**
- Coordination is currently taking place here: https://community.openvpn.net/Meetups/2026-Paderborn
- The date is around 17 and 18 October, location in Paderborn, Germany.
- For the t-shirt we have some idea of what to do. Will check with designer if he can do it for us.
-
- * **publish also on codeberg**
- Suggestion was made by cron2 to also publish openvpn2 on codeberg. OpenVPN3 Linux is already there at this time.
- It would not replace github but just serve as another place to publish the code.
- No clear decision made as yet. Concerns raised about new avenues of opening tickets/PRs.
-
- - **2.7 security audit**
- The security audit was completed for 2.7.0 and results are available internally.
- We are working to publish this in an official blog post. ordex and novaflash are driving this in OpenVPN Inc. internally.
-
- * **Coordinating big changes**
- A related discussion is how to handle big changesets (e.g. currently the multipeer changes from plaisthos and the
- oob changes from lev). There was some unhappiness that these changesets are dropped without sufficient context and
- that makes it hard to keep track of all the developments. One advise is that developers that want to have big (or many)
- changes merged are encouraged to write a mail to the mailing list to provide a "cover letter" for the patch set and
- a convenient place to discuss the overall direction without getting bogged down in the discussion of individual changes.
- We have lost this practice since not generally using mail-based patchsets anymore. That can be also a good opportunity
- to point out dicussions happening in PRs for the RFC document.
+ This is currently under review: https://gerrit.openvpn.net/q/topic:%22oob-server-probe%22
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9