Context Navigation

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #936, comment 3

initial	v1
3	3	Please point me to a reading or elaborate on the background of the design choice of per default using the same port on the client side as is used to connect to the server. I could imagine that it is around the NAT-traversal problem when using UDP.
4	4
5		Upon further input on the actual background I second #877 in regards of deeming it at least a glitch, since client side ports should use a port out of the ephemeral port range (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port) and been dynamically retrieved from the OS. That would not make assumptions on the availability of a specific port on the client-side by the configuration which usually is predifined by some means on the server-side.
	5	Upon further input on the actual background I second #877 in regards of deeming it at least a glitch, since client side ports should use a port out of the ephemeral port range (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port) and been dynamically retrieved from the OS. That would not make assumptions on the availability of a specific port on the client-side by the configuration which usually is predifined by some means on the server-side. Also conflicts arising if using the default port and starting both a server and a client on the same host would be circumvented.
6	6
7	7	Sidenotes: