Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1434, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/19/21 12:48:47 (3 years ago)
Author:
tct
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #1434, comment 6

    initial v1  
    11I ran a similar test for JJK's patch and generated 44 errors in 16hours.
     2
     3The test made it clear that JJK's patch will not set `common_name` at all after the client renegotiates and then times out. If the client disconnects using `--explicit-exit-notify` then jjk's patch works, as expected.
     4
     5The reason to record these findings it because I have thoroughly tested the results and these are the steps required to reproduce the issues.
     6
     7Summary:
     8
     91. Without JJK's patch, all that is required to trigger the original problem is for the client to renegotiate and then disconnect. The disconnect can be a time out or explicit, the problem always occurs, regardless.
     10
     112. With JJK's patch, the client must renegotiate and then time out to trigger the second problem.